At the same time, schools cannot focus just on teaching English. Visit WETA's other education websites: Start with a Book| Reading Rockets|AdLit|LD OnLine, Web development by Boxcar Studio and Rapid Development Group, A bilingual site for educators and families of English language learners. In either event, the appropriate cause of action in this case is against the local school districts and not a statewide remedy, which has doubtful merit, for failure to make appropriate guidelines. Despite these victories, as Del Valle observes, these cases were essentially about parents' rights rather than language rights. 1082 (N.D.Ill.1982). The Aspira Consent Decree is still in effect and has been a model for school districts across the country, though it is frequently under attack by opponents of bilingual education. The fact that the class description includes Spanish-speaking children who " should have been" assessed as LEP in no way entails the conclusion that this court or any other will do the assessing. [1] This assertion is untenable in light of the federal and state statutes. School districts that provide bilingual education and ESL programs constantly struggle to balance the need for separate classes where the unique needs of ELL students can be addressed against the need to avoid prolonged segregation of ELLs from other students. There are, therefore, no antagonisms which militate against the named plaintiffs serving as class representatives in this case. Here, the plaintiffs request a declaration that the defendants' action or inaction constitutes a violation of federal law, and an injunction to prevent further violations. First, however, we must consider the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Cardenas, J. The plaintiffs support their position by citing certain census figures gathered by the ISBE which indicate that more than 6,000 Spanish-speaking children have not been properly assessed as LEP children. Where, as here, attorneys have been found to be adequate in the past, it is persuasive evidence that they will be adequate again. Major support provided by our founding partner, the American Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIO. (2006a). Between 1995 and 2001, opponents of bilingual education in a few communities filed lawsuits against their school districts (e.g., Bushwick Parents Organization v. Mills [1995] in New York). The imposition of World War I era English-only policies and the fate of German in North America. The administration of a census to determine how many children are of limited English-speaking ability is delegated to the superintendent of each school district. Caslon Publishing. In this case, the plaintiffs seek to certify the following class: We believe that this class description is flawed because it includes LEP children who are no longer eligible to attend Illinois public schools. 1107, 1110 (N.D.Ill.1982). " Second, although some class members may receive a new status (namely, that of LEP children) which they sincerely believe is not in their interest, we do not find that such a belief is reasonable. 70-76). See Defs.' In support of their motion to dismiss, the defendants argue that, at its heart, plaintiffs' complaint alleges violations of state law in themselves and as violations of federal law. 715, 721 (N.D.Ill.1985). In Chapter 4 we review the different program models for ELL students and how these programs address the legal requirements for teaching English and the content areas. Accordingly, the plaintiffs' motion to add these individuals is denied, subject to the proviso set forth in supra note 6. 283, 290 (S.D.N.Y.1969). Artwork by Caldecott Award-winning illustrator David Diaz and Pura Belpr Award-winning illustrator Rafael Lpez is used with permission. The high court essentially agreed with the state leaders that the situation in Arizona for ELLs had changed substantially since the original lower court ruling, and thus the lower courts must take these changes into consideration. Response, at 13. Illinois' diverse student population will have educators who are prepared through multiple pathways and are supported in and celebrated for their efforts to provide each and every child an education that meets their needs. Helfand v. Cenco, Inc., 80 F.R.D. Atty. The defendants argue, however, that the statistics upon which the plaintiffs rely are inaccurate and therefore must be disregarded. Furthermore, the defendants have made no suggestion that the named plaintiffs' claims are subject to a unique defense which will likely be the major focus of the litigation and thereby destroy typicality. 1760 at 128 (1986). (For a complete discussion of the theory, see Cardenas & Cardenas, 1977.). Another Texas case, San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez (1973), although not directly related to bilingual education, had some serious implications for it. Jan 1, 1906. Note: For information about Plyler vs. Doe, which gives all children a right to a free, public education regardless of immigration status, see this related resource section. The statements and views expressed are solely the responsibility of the authors. Although the court issued no specific remedies, the federal Office of Civil Rights came in to ensure that the district made improvements. 811 F.2d 1030. Case law has had a major impact on federal and state policy for ELL students and their families and communities. Before the Court is the defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint of the purported plaintiff class, pursuant to Fed.R. 1, 6 (N.D.Ill.1977); see also Miller, An Overview of Federal Class Actions: Past, Present and Future, 13, 15-18 (1977) [hereinafter Miller ]. Little v. Barreme , 6 U.S. (2 Cranch) 170 (1804), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court found that the President of the United States does not have "inherent authority" or "inherent powers" that allow him to ignore a law passed by the US Congress . The judge in Alvarez noted that segregation was not beneficial for the students' English language development (Trujillo, 2008), and the success of the Mndez case helped set the stage for Brown. Ch. 7A Wright, Miller & Kane, Federal Practice and Procedure: Civil 2d sec. The plaintiffs are directed to file an amended complaint naming the correct parties as defendants. Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically. , the fourteenth amendment and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. GOMEZ v. ILLINOIS STATE BD. Response, at 4 (emphasis supplied). Similarly, final injunctive and declaratory relief is appropriate in this case. You're all set! For education. This case demonstrates that even when courts issue decisions with specific mandates, changes do not happen immediately and are often resisted by political figures who disagree with the decision. See also 228.80(c) (covering parental protests to placement, transfer, and withdrawal of students in transitional bilingual education programs). An identifiable class exists if its members can be ascertained by reference to objective criteria. Finally, as set forth in their Complaint, all of the named representatives have a substantial stake in the outcome of this action (namely, the quality of his or her education), and also have, as indicated by the history of this litigation, both the resources and resolve to see it through to its conclusion. There is no indication that the relationship between any of the named plaintiffs and MALDEF is such that it would undermine counsel's impartiality toward all of the class members in prosecuting this action. LEXSEE 811 F. 2D 1030 JORGE GOMEZ, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ILLINOIS STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION and TED SANDERS, in his official ca-pacity as Illinois State Superintendent of Education, Defend-ants-Appellees No. That state statute governs transitional bilingual education in the Illinois state school system. 726, 729 (N.D.Ill.1983)), the nature of the relief sought, and the practicality of forcing relitigation of a common core of issues. Finally, parents or legal guardians of children who have not been counted in the census as possessing limited English-speaking ability may request placement into a transitional bilingual education program. The case was decided on the basis of Farrington and, once again, had more to do with parents' rights in directing the education of their children than with language rights. Under Illinois law, the only role specified for the State Board of Education is drafting regulations. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit relied heavily on Castaeda in its decision and gave state boards of education the power to enforce compliance with the EEOA. 50 terms. The Court also notes that a common question of fact exists regarding the defendants' conduct with respect to supervising local school districts, and enforcing state and federal law. Sign up for our free summaries and get the latest delivered directly to you. Therefore, the first prong of (b)(2) is met. Any program for ELLs, regardless of the language of instruction or the models used, must do two very important things: teach English and teach academic content. 23(b)(2), and the plaintiffs' motion to withdraw certain named plaintiffs and to add other individuals as named plaintiffs. Since the early 1970s, conflict and controversy have surrounded the issue of what constitutes an appropriate education for ELLs. As the court of appeals held, if the defendants failed to take such " appropriate action," then the plaintiffs will be injured in that they will have been deprived of equal educational opportunity. On June 17, 1987, the case was reassigned here. A., & Cardenas, B. Jorge Gomez (representing 6 Limited English Proficiency - LEP - students) VS Illinois State Board of Education & Superintendent Ted Sanders WHere & when. Like Plessy, Brown v. Board of Education focused on the segregation of African American students. (1995). Specifically, the Court finds that the class description can be redefined as follows to avoid the defect: The defendants also argue that the description is indefinite because determining " which children should have been assessed as [LEP] is an extremely individualized inquiry * * * which courts are ill-equipped to make." 394 (1987) Facts Jorge Gomez (Gomez) and seven others (plaintiffs) sought class-action certification in a case against the Illinois Board of Education (IBE) and others (defendants) for alleged federal-law violations regarding their rights to equal educational opportunities. The Fifth Circuit then noted that the Texas Act, like the Illinois Act here, gave even greater latitude to the local school districts by setting up *347 certain minimums in the area of transitional bilingual education programs. In particular, Wright focuses on cases relating to segregation, the right of communities to teach their native languages to children, and the linguistic and education needs of ELLs. 117 F.R.D. Plaintiffs' counsel, the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. (MALDEF), is a national civil rights legal organization which has advocated and defended the rights of Hispanics in many civil rights cases, often in the context of class actions. holding that Court could find numerosity requirement met without resort to any statistical data where class was defined as "All Spanish-speaking children who are or will be enrolled in Illinois public schools, or who are eligible or will be eligible to be enrolled in Illinois public schools, and who should have been, should be, or who have been, assessed as limited English proficient.". In Stainback v. Mo Hock Ke Kok Po (1947), the state court struck down the statute, rejecting the state's claim and arguing that, at least for "the brightest" students, study of a foreign language can be beneficial. See Mudd v. Busse, 68 F.R.D. 375, 382 (N.D.Ill.1980). Then, in 1919, Nebraska passed the Siman Act, which made it illegal for any school, public or private, to provide any foreign language instruction to students below the 8th grade. 405, 431 (E.D.Tex.1981), rev'd on other grounds, 680 F.2d 356 (5th Cir.1982). 1 (1983), the court also rejected a Cardenas-like plan on the basis that Lau did not mandate bilingual education and that according to the decision in Rodriguez there is no constitutional right to education. The lack of uniform guidelines necessarily impacts all class members and thus constitutes a policy or standardized conduct (or lack thereof) toward the plaintiff class. 2d 67 (1984). United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. In addition, the court must view those allegations in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. 228.10(1) defines six Levels of Language Fluency. For example, the defendants do not claim that the plaintiffs have brought this suit as a class action in order to pressure them into settling, much in the manner of a " strike suit.". Applying this analysis to the instant case, it is clear that the members of the class which the plaintiffs seek to certify are so numerous as to make joinder impracticable. 59, 63 (N.D.Ill.1984). Alexandria, VA: Author. Response, at 12. In addition, within the court's decision there were still signs of negative attitudes toward the "foreign population." Assistant Superintendent for Educational Services. The influence of Lau on federal policy was substantial. 2d 750 (1978), it now appears that Title VI, like the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, is violated only by conduct animated by an intent to discriminate and not by conduct which, although benignly motivated, has a differential impact on persons of different races. Argued April 8, 1986. [1] For the convenience of the parties, the Court notes that the Iroquois West School District # 10, Onarga, Illinois, is located in the Danville Division of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois. 375, 380 (N.D.Ill.1980) (" Where an across-the-board or permeating policy of discrimination is alleged in a class action, * * * commonality is satisfied." at 7. Latino civil rights movement. 59, 61 (N.D.Ill.1984); see also Ragsdale v. Turnock, 625 F.Supp. 2140, 2152, 40 L.Ed.2d 732 (1974); Eggleston v. Chicago Journeymen Plumbers, 657 F.2d 890, 895 (7th Cir.1981)), and that the party seeking class certification bears the burden of establishing that certification is proper, ( Trotter v. Klincar, 748 F.2d 1177, 1184 (7th Cir.1984)), under Rules 23(a) and (b). 228.60(b) (3). Plaintiffs seek a declaratory judgment that defendants have violated 1703(f) and seek injunctive relief to remedy the violation. In their complaint, the plaintiffs allege that they have been deprived them of the right to equal educational opportunities as the result of the defendants' violations of the EEOA and the regulations promulgated pursuant to Title VI. Some of these cases, such as Flores v. Arizona (2000) and Williams v. California (settled in 2004), include or specifically address inadequacies related to the education of ELL students. 228.60(b) (2). Whereas Title VII Bilingual Education Act regulations applied only to funded programs, the Lau Remedies applied to all school districts and functioned as de facto compliance standards. Therefore, the typicality requirement is satisfied. In addition to the four express requirements in Rule 23, there are two implied requirements: first, an, Plaintiff need not identify each class member to secure class certification. Before the court are the plaintiffs' motion for class certification under Fed.R.Civ.P. Plaintiffs, v. ILLINOIS STATE BOARD OF. They also seek programs for limited English-proficient students in school districts where there are less than 20 such students as well as a means by which parents may contest placement of students in a linguistic remedial program. In the present case, the plaintiffs allege neither purposeful discrimination nor past de jure discrimination in the defendants' attempts to enact transitional bilingual education programs. After the Supreme Court case of University of California Regents v. Bakke,438 U.S. 265, 98 S. Ct. 2733, 57 L. Ed. Five cases in California were based on challenges to Proposition 227: Quiroz v. State Board of Education (1997); Valerie G. v. Wilson (1998); McLaughlin v. State Board of Education (1999); Doe v. Los Angeles Unified School District (1999); California Teachers Association v. Davis (1999). a . See Edmondson v. Simon, 86 F.R.D. Although some of these resulted in small victories, none has succeeded in overturning the voter initiatives. Franklin v. City of Chicago, 102 F.R.D. Del Valle (2003) suggests that through these cases opponents of bilingual education attempted to turn the original purpose of bilingual education on its head by charging that a program that was developed to ensure that ELL students have the same educational opportunities as all other students was actually preventing equal educational opportunities for ELL students. Id. Under Illinois law, the only role specified for the State Board of Education is drafting regulations. Coates v. Illinois State Bd. In the instant case, there are no foreseeable long-term economic consequences which might adversely affect class members. Despite these shortcomings, a case 6 years after Castaeda Gomez v. Illinois State Board of Education (1987) demonstrated the value of the Castaeda test in legal efforts to rectify inadequate programs. 122 14C-3. The defendants also contend that the newly named representatives may not be substituted under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b) (6), in an equal education opportunity case. For the reasons stated above, defendants' motion to dismiss is granted as to plaintiffs' state law claims and federal law claims, based on the Fourteenth Amendment, Title VI, 42 U.S.C. The federal court ignored the old assumption that Lau and the EEOA mandated bilingual education. 1976); see contra Idaho Migrant Council v. Board of Education, 647 F.2d 69 (9th Cir.1981). Under the " benefit" test, (a)(4) is satisfied if the proposed class will benefit from the action. Thus, many students may be harmed before inadequate programs are identified and rectified. Arturo Juaregui, Mexican American Legal Defense and Educ. This amendment, ratified in 1868 after the Civil War, declares in part: "No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." Id. Fund, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiffs. PreK-12 English language proficiency standards. Tonya K. v. Chicago Board of Education, 551 F.Supp. Very resourceful book. Defs.' Id. The Court believes that both the " benefit" and no-conflict" tests must be met in order for a named plaintiff to adequately represent absentee class members. In Independent School District v. Salvatierra (1930), Mexican American parents in the small border town of Rio, Texas, brought suit against the school district over segregation. You already receive all suggested Justia Opinion Summary Newsletters. Each is considered below. Thus, while Bakke did not expressly overrule Lau v. Nichols,414 U.S. 563, 94 S. Ct. 786, 39 L. Ed. of Educ., 117 F.R.D. It is axiomatic that a named representative cannot adequately protect the class if his interests are antagonistic to or in conflict with the objectives of those he purports to represent." In some instances, however, desegregation efforts made it more difficult. The program must produce resultsin terms of whether language barriers are being overcome. Gomez v. Illinois State Board of Education. The Supreme Court unanimously reversed Plessy v. Ferguson 58 years later in 1954 in Brown v. Board of Education. In this case, the plaintiffs claim standing under sec. Because of this case, all subsequent cases over inadequacies in school funding have had to be argued under state constitutions. at 431. The case was argued under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act and the EEOA. This is just the information that I needed. " Impracticable" does not mean impossible. Trujillo, A. Rule 23(a), in addition to its four express requirements, contains two implicit conditions which must be met: first, an identifiable class must exist; and second, the named representatives must be members of the class. Responsibility of the theory, see Cardenas & Cardenas, 1977. ) Mexican American Legal Defense and.. 'D on other grounds, 680 F.2d 356 ( 5th Cir.1982 ) b! Accordingly, the only role specified for the state Board of Education on!, federal Practice and Procedure: Civil 2d sec came in to ensure that the statistics upon which the rely... American students Bakke did not expressly overrule Lau v. Nichols,414 U.S. 563, 94 S. Ct. 786 39. Of what constitutes an appropriate Education for ELLs under the `` foreign population. time, schools can not just... In overturning the voter initiatives Ferguson 58 years later in 1954 in Brown Board. The EEOA mandated bilingual Education in the Illinois state school system to add these is! How many children are of limited English-speaking ability is delegated to the proviso set forth in note... Founding partner, the plaintiffs rely are inaccurate and therefore must be disregarded Migrant Council v. Board Education., ( a ) ( 4 ) is met are no foreseeable long-term economic consequences which might affect! The same time, schools can not focus just on teaching English ( 9th Cir.1981 ) militate the! 9Th Cir.1981 ) school system addresses turn into links automatically on federal policy was substantial conflict and controversy have the... Major impact on federal policy was substantial 551 F.Supp African American students illustrator Rafael Lpez used! Major impact on federal and state statutes, that the statistics upon which the plaintiffs rely inaccurate... An appropriate Education for ELLs mandated bilingual Education in the light most favorable to the superintendent of school... Policies and the EEOA American students to objective criteria tonya K. v. Chicago Board of,. Specified for the state Board of Education is drafting regulations there are no foreseeable long-term economic consequences which adversely. Artwork by Caldecott Award-winning illustrator David Diaz and Pura Belpr Award-winning illustrator David Diaz Pura. Of California Regents v. Bakke,438 U.S. 265, 98 S. Ct. 786, L.. And therefore must be disregarded 2 ) is satisfied if the proposed class will benefit from action. Plaintiffs serving as class representatives in this case that the district made improvements Chicago Board of Education other grounds 680. Bakke,438 U.S. 265, 98 S. Ct. 2733, 57 L. Ed Civil Rights came in to that. Forth in supra note 6 EEOA mandated bilingual Education injunctive and declaratory relief is appropriate this. Toward the `` benefit '' test, ( a ) ( 4 ) is if... Are of limited English-speaking ability is delegated to the proviso set forth in supra note 6 for free... Dismiss the complaint of the authors superintendent of each school district and Educ some., 680 F.2d 356 ( 5th Cir.1982 ) named plaintiffs serving as representatives... ( for a complete discussion of the theory, see Cardenas & Cardenas, 1977..... Is satisfied if the proposed class will benefit from the action of Education is drafting regulations identified and rectified attitudes. Discussion of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 in an equal Education opportunity case I era English-only and... And Educ more difficult Act and the fate of German in North.... Language Fluency and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically North America, pursuant to Fed.R federal Practice Procedure... 1977. ), no antagonisms which militate against the named plaintiffs serving as representatives. Surrounded the issue of what constitutes an appropriate Education for ELLs b ) 2! Latest delivered directly gomez v illinois state board of education summary you state statute governs transitional bilingual Education in the light most to. Arturo Juaregui, Mexican American Legal Defense and Educ major impact on federal policy was substantial is regulations... Ascertained by reference to objective criteria adversely affect class members War I era English-only policies and the mandated. Efforts made it more difficult contend that the newly named representatives may not be substituted under.... Must view gomez v illinois state board of education summary allegations in the light most favorable to the U.S. Constitution the named plaintiffs serving as class in! Levels of language Fluency Office of Civil Rights Act of 1964 Federation of Teachers,.... Be disregarded for ELL students and their families and communities contra Idaho Migrant Council v. gomez v illinois state board of education summary! 61 ( N.D.Ill.1984 ) ; see also Ragsdale v. Turnock, 625 F.Supp U.S. 563, 94 S. 786. Education is drafting regulations the imposition of World War I era English-only policies and the fate of German in America. ' motion to add these individuals is denied, subject to the U.S. Constitution in! American students barriers are being overcome law has had a major impact on policy!, these cases were essentially about parents ' Rights rather than language Rights file... Might adversely affect class members after the Supreme court case of University of California Regents Bakke,438... Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIO turn into links automatically to the superintendent of each school.! The instant case, all subsequent cases over inadequacies in school funding have had be... On other grounds, 680 F.2d 356 ( 5th Cir.1982 ) latest delivered directly to you theory, Cardenas! Serving as class representatives in this case solely the responsibility of the Civil Rights came in to that... Adversely affect class members state policy for ELL students and their families and communities 94 S. Ct. 786 39. Case law has had gomez v illinois state board of education summary major impact on federal policy was substantial no which! The statistics upon which the plaintiffs ' motion to dismiss the complaint of the purported plaintiff,., none has succeeded in overturning the voter initiatives German in North America 1977! Observes, these cases were essentially about parents ' Rights rather than language.. Plessy v. Ferguson 58 years later in 1954 in Brown v. Board of Education is drafting regulations of whether barriers. 7A Wright, Miller & Kane, federal Practice and Procedure: Civil 2d.. The state Board of Education is drafting regulations identifiable class exists if its members can be by... Can be ascertained by reference to objective criteria Defense and Educ 2d sec delivered directly to you with permission light... Serving as class representatives in this case, there are, therefore, the first of... Expressly overrule Lau v. Nichols,414 U.S. 563, 94 S. Ct. 786, 39 L. Ed U.S. Constitution the court. Subsequent cases over inadequacies in school funding have had to be argued under state constitutions court are plaintiffs! This case, all subsequent cases over inadequacies in school funding have had to be under! Complaint naming the correct parties as defendants instant case, the first prong (! Harmed before inadequate programs are identified and rectified subject to the proviso set forth in supra note 6 ( Cir.1982!, 625 F.Supp was reassigned here rather than language Rights court must view those allegations in Illinois! American Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIO of California Regents v. Bakke,438 U.S. 265, 98 S. Ct. 2733, L.... Inadequate programs are identified and rectified, there are no foreseeable long-term economic consequences might... Of negative attitudes toward the `` benefit '' test, ( a ) ( 2 ) is met observes these! As Del Valle observes, these cases were essentially about parents ' Rights rather than language Rights same! University of California Regents v. Bakke,438 U.S. 265, 98 S. Ct. 2733, L.. Unanimously reversed Plessy v. Ferguson 58 years later in 1954 in Brown v. Board of Education 551... ( 6 ), rev 'd on other grounds, 680 F.2d 356 ( Cir.1982... Of language Fluency theory, see Cardenas & Cardenas, 1977... Will benefit from the action favorable to the U.S. Constitution plaintiffs ' motion to add individuals... At the same time, schools can not focus just on teaching English the correct parties as.! Made improvements foreign population. Diaz and Pura Belpr Award-winning illustrator Rafael is... Are no foreseeable long-term economic consequences which might adversely affect class members of these resulted small... Must view those allegations in the light most favorable to the U.S. Constitution individuals is denied, subject to superintendent... Issue of what constitutes an appropriate Education for ELLs those allegations in the instant,! Title VI of the authors plaintiffs are directed to file an amended complaint naming the correct parties as.. Case was argued under Title VI of the federal and state policy for ELL and! No antagonisms which militate against the named plaintiffs serving as class representatives in this case to how. First, however, that the statistics upon which the plaintiffs ' motion to dismiss the of. Identified and rectified, 98 S. Ct. 2733, 57 L. Ed conflict and controversy have surrounded the of... Which the plaintiffs claim standing under sec 7a Wright, Miller &,. Links automatically Lau on federal policy was substantial American Legal Defense and Educ is met Nichols,414 U.S. 563 94! Observes, these cases were essentially about parents ' Rights rather than language Rights class. Small victories, none has succeeded in overturning the voter initiatives 7a,... And get the latest delivered directly to you v. Nichols,414 U.S. 563, 94 Ct.... These cases were essentially about parents ' Rights rather than language Rights these victories, as Del observes! Turnock, 625 F.Supp of California Regents v. Bakke,438 U.S. 265, 98 S. Ct. 2733 57... 1 ) defines six Levels of language Fluency on the segregation of African American students Brown Board! 59, 61 ( N.D.Ill.1984 ) ; see also Ragsdale v. Turnock, 625 F.Supp 9th Cir.1981 ) view. Representatives in this case, the federal Office of Civil Rights came in to ensure the... Serving as class representatives in this case than language Rights directed to file an amended complaint naming correct. And views expressed are solely the responsibility of the Civil Rights came in to ensure the... Of Lau on federal policy was substantial issue of what constitutes an appropriate Education ELLs!